tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post114504885101441987..comments2024-03-17T03:22:42.344-05:00Comments on Jeffrey Baldwin Memorial Site: Public RallyAmandahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12477753348213542451noreply@blogger.comBlogger63125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-17313677817738338772022-07-15T16:23:39.566-05:002022-07-15T16:23:39.566-05:00replica bags gucci fake gucci y3a16r2u85 replica b...replica bags gucci <a href="https://www.dolabuy.ru/gucci-c-157_168/" rel="nofollow"><strong>fake gucci</strong></a> y3a16r2u85 replica bags and shoes see this website h6a90m3m73 <a href="https://www.dolabuy.ru/louis-vuitton-c-157_158/" rel="nofollow"><strong>replica louis vuitton bags</strong></a> 7a replica bags philippines i7v43b6k36 check out here b4r89z8c91 <a href="https://www.dolabuy.ru/" rel="nofollow"><strong>high replica bags</strong></a> replica bags 168 mallsmasmeahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01480313444383534670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-24866829641180222092019-11-24T22:41:14.755-06:002019-11-24T22:41:14.755-06:00cheap jordans
jordan shoes
jordan shoes
off white
...<a href="http://www.shoesjordan.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>cheap jordans</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.jordans.net.co" rel="nofollow"><strong>jordan shoes</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.jordans.com.co" rel="nofollow"><strong>jordan shoes</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.offwhite.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>off white</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.fitflops-saleclearance.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>fitflop</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.fila.us.org" rel="nofollow"><strong>fila shoes</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.yeezy700.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>yeezy 700</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.jordansshoes.us.org" rel="nofollow"><strong>jordan shoes</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.coachoutletscoach.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>coach outlet online</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.balenciagashoes.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>balenciaga</strong></a><br />yanmaneeehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15229165146687805497noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-40796923191735284672015-01-26T16:59:04.849-06:002015-01-26T16:59:04.849-06:00Good hard workGood hard workAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00838690320664633984noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-2947682300000778182013-06-04T12:26:46.261-05:002013-06-04T12:26:46.261-05:00Everyone loves it when folks come together and sha...Everyone loves it when folks come together and share opinions.<br />Great blog, keep it up!<br /><br />Have a look at my webpage: <a href="http://xxx-fuck.net" rel="nofollow">xxx fuck</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-55746316819112700052010-08-13T18:23:38.276-05:002010-08-13T18:23:38.276-05:00In biology, sex is [URL=http://sex.pourle.net/lesb...In biology, sex is [URL=http://sex.pourle.net/lesbian+sex+in+shower.html]lesbian sex in shower[/url] <br /> a process of combining and mixing [URL=http://sex.pourle.net/asian+teen+sex+videos.html]asian teen sex videos[/url] <br /> genetic traits, often resulting [URL=http://sex.pourle.net/gay+sex+parties.html]gay sex parties[/url] <br /> in the specialization of organisms into [URL=http://sex.pourle.net/free+full+length+animal+sex+videos.html]free full length animal sex videos[/url] <br /> a male or female variety (known as a sex). Sexual reproduction involves combining specialized cells (gametes) to form offspring [URL=http://sex.pourle.net/free+porn+sex+clips.html]free porn sex clips[/url] <br /> that [URL=http://sex.pourle.net/buckeey+sex+tape.html]buckeey sex tape[/url] <br /> inherit traits from both parents. Gametes can be identical in form and function (known as isogametes), but in many cases an asymmetry has evolved [URL=http://sex.pourle.net/free+tube+streaming+animal+farm+sex+with+women+anal+licking+anal+cum+no+sign+ups.html]free tube streaming animal farm sex with women anal licking anal cum no sign ups[/url] <br /> such that two sex-specific types of gametes (heterogametes) exist: male [URL=http://sex.pourle.net/princess+donna+my+first+sex+teacher.html]princess donna my first sex teacher[/url] <br /> gametes are small, [URL=http://sex.pourle.net/how+to+have+sex.html]how to have sex[/url] <br /> motile, and optimized to transport their genetic information over a distance, while female gametes are large, non-motile and contain [URL=http://sex.pourle.net/forced+young+teen+sex.html]forced young teen sex[/url] <br /> the nutrients necessary for the early development of the young organism.<br />An organism's sex is [URL=http://sex.pourle.net/cartoon+sex+of+twilight.html]cartoon sex of twilight[/url] <br /> defined by the gametes it produces: males produce male [URL=http://sex.pourle.net/sex+and+xxx+porn.html]sex and xxx porn[/url] <br /> gametes (spermatozoa, or sperm) while females produce female gametes (ova, or egg cells); individual organisms which produce both male and female [URL=http://sex.pourle.net/girls+having+lesbian+sex.html]girls having lesbian sex[/url] <br /> gametes are termed hermaphroditic. Frequently, physical differences are associated with the different sexes of an organism; these sexual dimorphisms can reflect the different reproductive pressures the sexes experience.<br />[URL=http://sex.pourle.net/rough+sex+porn.html]rough sex porn[/url]Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-49447991984955097552010-08-13T11:49:46.689-05:002010-08-13T11:49:46.689-05:00Everybody[url=http://sex.jelev.eu/a+teen+porno+ani...Everybody[url=http://sex.jelev.eu/a+teen+porno+animation+net.html]a teen porno animation net[/url] heard rumours [url=http://sex.jelev.eu/behind+granny+mature+porno+tube.html]behind granny mature porno tube[/url] about women[url=http://sex.jelev.eu/free+teen+porno+videos.html]free teen porno videos[/url] faking orgasms. Is that true? The majority of women have [url=http://sex.jelev.eu/play+free+porno+flash+games.html]play free porno flash games[/url] faked at least one orgasm, yet some fake almost all of them. Why do they do that? There[url=http://sex.jelev.eu/fotos+porno+de+hombres+gratis.html]fotos porno de hombres gratis[/url] are many reasons and the case is that there's [url=http://sex.jelev.eu/free+long+porno+movies.html]free long porno movies[/url] no one to blame.<br />The most [url=http://sex.jelev.eu/indian+private+porno.html]indian private porno[/url] common are two [url=http://sex.jelev.eu/free+old-young+porno.html]free old-young porno[/url] reasons: they[url=http://sex.jelev.eu/porno+xxx+adult+sites.html]porno xxx adult sites[/url] don't want to make their partners feel bad [url=http://sex.jelev.eu/filme+porno+avec+des+handicapes.html]filme porno avec des handicapes[/url] or they are tired and just want to end sex. Most females say that their partners ar[url=http://sex.jelev.eu/drunk+porno+tubes.html]drunk porno tubes[/url] e not satisfied until the[url=http://sex.jelev.eu/filme+porno+gratis++sex+filme+porno++filme+porno++filme+porb.html]filme porno gratis sex filme porno filme porno filme porb[/url] girls feels orgasm, there's only one way to make them feel happy and stop the[url=http://sex.jelev.eu/amateur+porno+auditions.html]amateur porno auditions[/url] exhausting procedure - fake.<br />Another [url=http://sex.jelev.eu/filme+porno+cu+minore+sub+16.html]filme porno cu minore sub 16[/url] reason is that a[url=http://sex.jelev.eu/free+gay+porno+office.html]free gay porno office[/url] typical female [url=http://sex.jelev.eu/free+hot+porno+movies.html]free hot porno movies[/url] doesn't seek for orgasm; she desires a sexual [url=http://sex.jelev.eu/sex+porno+video.html]sex porno video[/url] relationship only because she wants intimacy. Still, such an attitude may make her partner feel bad. [url=http://sex.jelev.eu/asian+porno+video+clips.html]asian porno video clips[/url] The only way out is to [url=http://sex.jelev.eu/ver+videos+porno+gratis.html]ver videos porno gratis[/url] fake it out.<br />[url=http://sex.jelev.eu/dad+and+son+incest+porno+tube.html]dad and son incest porno tube[/url] Some women never really experience orgasm while making sex, but they want their partner to feel good about himself and her. Men usually expect women to have pleasure, that's why females have no other choice. They have to fake to have a good relationship.<br />Loss of interest, having sex only because the partner wants to, also makes women to fake. Most females talk to their friends about such things and while they know other women act it, they do so too, because it's an easier way to have a good relationship.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-48080831614897604602007-03-16T18:10:00.000-05:002007-03-16T18:10:00.000-05:00I am a grandmother that is looking for Amanda Reed...I am a grandmother that is looking for Amanda Reed. If you could put me in contact with her it would be wonderful. It is regarding the safety of children. I can be reach at lamimi_francaise@hotmail.com<BR/>Thank-you!<BR/>LindaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1146621746535688832006-05-02T21:02:00.000-05:002006-05-02T21:02:00.000-05:00This is ONE OF THE BEST ARTICLES about the angel t...This is ONE OF THE BEST ARTICLES about the angel that this blog is for - please read if you have not already. What he suffered is beyond horrific and the CCAS IS RESPONSIBLE.<BR/><BR/>The Globe and Mail<BR/><BR/>CHILD PROTECTION<BR/><BR/>FAILING JEFFREY<BR/><BR/>As the murder trial of Jeffrey Baldwin's grandparents moves into its final phase, CHRISTIE BLATCHFORD looks at the role in the family's life of the Catholic Children's Aid Society of Toronto. Through exclusive interviews with some of the key players and access to documents not part of the criminal trial, a picture emerges of how the agency failed again and again to protect the children.<BR/><BR/>BY CHRISTIE BLATCHFORD<BR/>MONDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2005 PAGE A8<BR/><BR/>If the story of Jeffrey Baldwin is about one thing -- aside from the guilt or innocence of the grandparents accused of starving him to death -- it is about the child-welfare agency that was for 36 years intimately enmeshed with the little boy's family.<BR/><BR/>It was this agency, the Catholic Children's Aid Society of Toronto, that consented, fatally as it turns out, to Jeffrey and his three siblings being placed in the care of the grandparents.<BR/><BR/>Through exclusive interviews with some of the key players and access to documents not part of the criminal trial of Elva Bottineau and Norman Kidman, The Globe and Mail has pieced together a harrowing account of how the CCAS failed to protect the youngsters.<BR/><BR/>Yet while the trial put Ms. Bottineau and Mr. Kidman under the microscope before Ontario Superior Court Judge David Watt, with nothing less than their liberty at stake, they are the only principals in this tale who have had their conduct fully scrutinized.<BR/><BR/>The CCAS is not in any meaningful and public way held to account for its mistakes in the death of five-year-old Jeffrey in 2002, or any other. Neither are any of its 52 sister children's aid societies in Ontario, which in fiscal 2004-05 collectively ate up $1.174-billion of taxpayers' money.<BR/><BR/>The only body that even critically examines the deaths of children like Jeffrey is a small, underfunded and woefully short-staffed arm of the Ontario Coroner's Office -- the pediatric death review committee -- and it has no power to enforce change.<BR/><BR/>Indeed, what the late Ronald Reagan once said about government appears true of Ontario's children's aid societies: They are, in the former U.S. president's words, "like a big baby -- an alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other."<BR/><BR/>The CCAS has been involved with Jeffrey's family since 1969, when his maternal grandmother, Ms. Bottineau, gave birth to her first child, through the fall of this year, when Jeffrey's surviving brother and two sisters were abruptly removed and separated from the foster home where they had lived together for almost three years.<BR/><BR/>These two events, which bookend all else that happened, demonstrate such a stark lack of common sense, or street smarts, that it is as though agency workers were forbidden to use the tools that ordinary people call upon every day to make assessments of those they meet: What does Mr. X look like? What is Ms. Y's background? What have they done in the past?<BR/><BR/>The CCAS didn't do even a rudimentary check on the grandparents and thus missed in its own aged records the fact that Ms. Bottineau and Mr. Kidman, now 54 and 53 respectively, were both convicted child abusers when the agency approved them as legal guardians of their daughter Yvonne's quartet of youngsters in three separate proceedings over three years ending in 1998. <BR/><BR/>The agency has explained this failure, in part, by citing a policy vacuum (there was then no rule to make such checks in cases where relatives were stepping into the breach) and by pointing to the confusion caused by the plethora of last names in the case and no automatic link to old files.<BR/><BR/>But the agency didn't make this mistake only once. <BR/><BR/>It made the same mistake at least five times over the years.<BR/><BR/>As Yvonne and her husband, Richard Baldwin, kept losing their children to her mother and Mr. Kidman, so did they keep on having more -- one who was stillborn in 1999 and another who was born this past summer and was immediately seized by the CCAS.<BR/><BR/>It was a pattern perhaps bred in the bone.<BR/><BR/>Ms. Bottineau was convicted of assault causing bodily harm as a teenage mom in the 1970 pneumonia death of her first baby, Eva, who later was found to have suffered multiple fractures consistent with battered-child syndrome.<BR/><BR/>Undeterred, Ms. Bottineau had another child the next year, and another the year after that, both by the same boy-man -- reported in agency files to be a distant cousin and a heavy-drinking product of the children's aid and foster systems -- before she took up with Mr. Kidman.<BR/><BR/>It was these two youngsters who in 1978 Mr. Kidman seriously assaulted. Late that December, he pleaded guilty to two counts of assault causing bodily harm for what were described as extensive beatings. He was fined $150 on each count.<BR/><BR/>But there was much more in the CCAS files, only some of it made public at trial and virtually none of it used when it mattered most.<BR/><BR/>Ms. Bottineau was first diagnosed in a 1970 psychiatric assessment as a "borderline mental defective" with an IQ of 69, a hostile personality and a sexually provocative manner. The diagnosis was confirmed nine years later when psychologist Ruth Bray assessed her again at the request of a judge.<BR/><BR/>The judge had asked for the assessment because the couple still had their three young daughters living with them --Yvonne, Yvette and Tammy -- though the CCAS had removed the two children Mr. Kidman assaulted.<BR/><BR/>The Globe has interviewed one of those two children, the girl, who is now 34 and living in southern Ontario, gainfully employed and happily married with two youngsters of her own.<BR/><BR/>So uncannily similar was her and her brother's dreadful childhood to the suffering Jeffrey and his sister would endure three decades later that it is almost as though the first two youngsters served as practice children for the grandparents, providing them with the opportunity to perfect their maltreatment skills.<BR/><BR/>What happened to Jeffrey and his sister, who were then five and six, "is exactly what happened to us'' at the same age, she said, referring to herself and her now 33-year-old brother.<BR/><BR/>As Jeffrey and his sister were locked in a dank and unheated bedroom, she was kept in a dog cage, sometimes for weeks at a stretch, and her brother confined to a garbage can. As Jeffrey and his sister were so desperately thirsty that they drank from the toilet, so did this woman and her brother. As Jeffrey and his sister had to stand on a rubber mat in a corner of the Bottineau-Kidman house that was known as "the pigs' wall," so, when this woman and her brother were allowed out, were they made to stand over an air-intake vent that was between two bedrooms.<BR/><BR/>"You were always cold," she said, her voice jarringly mild. "I was always hungry. I drank out of the toilet. It was exactly the same."<BR/><BR/>A lengthy affidavit produced at the trial by CCAS worker Jennifer Maryk, who conducted a review of the agency's records after Jeffrey's death, confirms much of what this woman told The Globe about the abuse she and her brother endured, particularly their state of near-starvation and their over-sexualized behaviour, complete with the girl's disclosure to a foster mother that she and her brother "had been taught to perform sexual acts together."<BR/><BR/>This was all in the agency's own records. It is undeniable that in the late 1970s the CCAS recognized -- at least on paper -- that Ms. Bottineau and Mr. Kidman were dangerous.<BR/><BR/>Indeed, the agency maintained for several years "orders of supervision" on the family and the three young daughters whom the CCAS left in the home.<BR/><BR/>Yet within four years of Mr. Kidman's criminal convictions, the agency was anointing Ms. Bottineau as one of its own child-care providers.<BR/><BR/>Ms. Maryk's affidavit shows that by 1983, Ms. Bottineau "was working as a home child-care provider with the support" of the CCAS. The woman went from being what a psychologist described in a report to the agency as "a danger to herself as well as to others" to so reliable a caregiver that the CCAS was entrusting her with other people's children.<BR/><BR/>From April, 1983, through to November, 1984, and perhaps even through the fall of 1986 and beyond -- it is unclear from the affidavit how long it went on -- Ms. Bottineau was being paid by the agency as a "funded daycare provider," even despite what appear to be at least two documented complaints about sexual abuse that were deemed "unsubstantiated."<BR/><BR/>The agency declined a request from The Globe to discuss these issues at this time.<BR/><BR/>"The CCAS deeply regrets the circumstances that led to Jeffrey Baldwin's death," reads a statement the agency provided. "We plan to discuss the substantial changes we have made to our own operating policies and the sector-wide reforms under way that will help reduce the risks that such a tragedy could happen again in the future."<BR/><BR/>But not now, the agency said. "While the charges against Elva Bottineau and Norman Kidman are before the courts, the CCAS has been advised by legal counsel that it should not comment on these issues before the trial is completed."<BR/><BR/>The only external review of the CCAS conduct, written by a consultant named Susan Abell in September of 2004 at the agency's request, makes no bones about background checks being a core function of the social worker's job or of the impact the lack of them had in Jeffrey's case. <BR/><BR/>"The inability to connect to the past history of the extended family when the children were referred for protection services in 1994 meant that the Catholic Children's Aid Society was a participant in Jeffrey and his siblings being at risk," Ms. Abell wrote.<BR/><BR/>It was Ms. Abell who identified "at least five different pivotal points when there was the opportunity to search for the old records," the latest in 1998 when Jeffrey's little brother was placed with the grandparents, but that it was never done.<BR/><BR/>Even here, though the agency did a "formal home study" on the grandparents before the little boy was placed with them, Ms. Abell said, "the report was minimal and doesn't include a police check."<BR/><BR/>As far back as 1997, the year before that home study was done, even Hockey Canada was urging its member minor hockey associations "to conduct criminal record checks where possible" and to "thoroughly research individuals who apply for coaching and other positions." Such checks are now mandatory across the nation.<BR/><BR/>The Globe has obtained a copy of Ms. Abell's 37-page report.<BR/><BR/>Even this woman, a veteran social worker and the executive director of the Ottawa CAS before her retirement two years ago, didn't get to interview the front-line workers involved in Jeffrey's case "due to legal implications."<BR/><BR/>However, it appears unlikely Ms. Abell knew that Ms. Bottineau was, for that undetermined period in the 1980s, a CCAS-paid daycare provider.<BR/><BR/>Certainly, she made no reference to it and doesn't appear to count it as one of the five points where she says the agency logically might have checked for the old records.<BR/><BR/>The terms of her review, she said frankly, were determined by CCAS senior management, who decided she should focus on the services provided to Jeffrey's parents during the period 1994 to 2002.<BR/><BR/>Ms. Abell concluded that, because Ms. Bottineau went to the CCAS with concerns about her daughter and son-in-law's care for their first baby, and kept pestering the agency as each successive child was born, the CCAS began to see her as an ally.<BR/><BR/>"Given the level of her concern for the children," Ms. Abell wrote, "the role of the grandmother was viewed as a family strength."<BR/><BR/>Moreover, Ms. Abell found, "there does not appear to have been follow-up with the family after the children were living with the grandparents. With each subsequent placement, the grandmother applied for custody within weeks and the case was closed for further service."<BR/><BR/>Lacklustre background checks and poor investigations are familiar laments about children's aid agencies.<BR/><BR/>Though Jeffrey was not "receiving services," as the jargon of child welfare puts it, when he died on Nov. 30, 2002, he would have been if the CCAS had done minimal checks -- either of the records it already had or even a simple criminal-records search.<BR/><BR/>In the eight years before Jeffrey died, the agency was involved in much-publicized deaths of two other young clients -- the April, 1994, murder of baby Sara Podniewicz by her parents, and the June, 1997, starvation death of infant Jordan Heikamp. Both died while ostensibly being monitored by the CCAS.<BR/><BR/>In those cases, as with this one, it was evident that CCAS workers failed to properly investigate the caregivers and to adequately monitor the vulnerable children.<BR/><BR/>As British Columbia Judge Thomas Gove noted in his famous 1995 review of one little boy's death and the child-welfare system in that province, "Many other children continue to die in similar circumstances, yet little seems to change."<BR/><BR/>Many of the most significant problems he found in the death of Matthew Vaudreil centred on poor investigations. As he noted, "background history . . . does not seem to be part of an investigation."<BR/><BR/>All the damning information the CCAS had in what Ms. Abell described as "child-protection files, court files, child-in-care files and adoption files" was never once accessed.<BR/><BR/>Even without it, the agency was concerned enough about Jeffrey and his three siblings that four times they held a "high-risk-case conference."<BR/><BR/>Yet the only record checks performed were done on the people who were losing the youngsters -- their parents, Yvonne Kidman and Richard Baldwin. Not one check was done on those seeking custody of them -- the grandparents.<BR/><BR/>Most cruelly, it is debatable what the agency has learned -- beyond adopting a new policy requiring background checks on relatives seeking custody -- from its failures in Jeffrey's death.<BR/><BR/>The same day the little boy died, his siblings were retrieved by the CCAS. After a brief stint in emergency foster care, using what's called a "collateral" agency, Carpe Diem, the CCAS placed the shattered youngsters in a permanent foster home so far removed from their experience, and so preposterously beautiful to their weary eyes, that Jeffrey's oldest sister believed they had been brought there merely to have Christmas pictures taken.<BR/><BR/>There, under the care of a woman named Karen and her husband and their own two young girls, the siblings bloomed.<BR/><BR/>They did so as one would expect in youngsters who had been grossly traumatized -- in fits and starts. Each child had different and painful adjustments to make.<BR/><BR/>The sister who had been locked away with Jeffrey had to learn that a toilet was not for drinking from or washing in; that she did not have to Hoover down everything in sight because there really was another meal just around the corner; that she should brush her hair. The little girl had to learn, in short, that she was a valuable, worthy and lovable human being.<BR/><BR/>The older sister, who had been treated relatively well under the Bottineau-Kidman regime but simultaneously given far too much responsibility and far too much exposure to adult anxieties, had to learn that she was a child who was free to be a child.<BR/><BR/>Mostly, she had to learn to accept that she could not have been, should not have been, and would never have been expected to be Jeffrey's saviour.<BR/><BR/>Critically, she had to learn that her terrible, corrosive guilt was misplaced.<BR/><BR/>The youngest boy, who had been spoiled by Ms. Bottineau and Mr. Kidman in the ways they believed mattered -- with material things and overtly preferential treatment -- had to realize that he was no longer the first among unequals. He had to pick up after himself, not order about like a servant any adult female he encountered, and stop whacking and berating his little sister. He had to understand he was no longer that precocious creature called "the Prince" by his grandparents.<BR/><BR/>These are tough lessons, not learned overnight and arguably not even in a lifetime.<BR/><BR/>But the children made significant progress, every bit of it chronicled in the regular "plans of care" that Carpe Diem prepared and sent to the CCAS and its lead worker.<BR/><BR/>The little girl, enrolled by her foster parents in everything from karate lessons to swimming and Brownies, gained physical confidence and, with that, began to show the first tenuous signs of self-acceptance. The elder girl made friends at school and became popular, did well academically and began to shed the reserve that was a necessary shield in her grandparents' house, where Jeffrey was a dirty secret to be kept from the outside world. The little boy, though prone to temper tantrums and stubbornness, was learning that men, especially husbands, need not hit their wives and that women were not chattel.<BR/><BR/>It was this youngster who inadvertently precipitated the crisis that, just before Thanksgiving this year, saw the children abruptly yanked from the foster home and separated.<BR/><BR/>The reason for their removal has been shrouded in secrecy, but The Globe has interviewed the foster parents at length and seen documents that appear to support their version of events.<BR/><BR/>The foster mother was walking the five children -- Jeffrey's sibs and her own two -- to school. En route, the little guy suddenly sat down smack in a neighbour's driveway and refused to move.<BR/><BR/>"Buster," she said, "if I have to drag you there I will," and with that, and a reminder that he would get to play basketball that day -- his new favourite game -- she scooped him under one arm and half-carried, half-dragged him the rest of the way.<BR/><BR/>"They [the CCAS] say I should have stayed with him," she said in the recent interview. "But I couldn't leave the four girls on their own.<BR/><BR/>"I'm not Betty Crocker," the foster mom said with a tearful grin of how she handled things that day, "I'm a normal mom."<BR/><BR/>The little boy went into his class and promptly reported: "My mom dragged me here." Teachers and school officials were well aware that they had the youngsters from a "high-profile" child-death case in their ranks. They were on high alert, and called the area children's aid society.<BR/><BR/>In short order, social workers descended upon the school, and all the children -- but for one of the foster mom's own daughters, who was sick and had gone back home with her --were privately questioned.<BR/><BR/>The little boy, finding himself in his rightful place once again -- the centre of adult attention -- complained that his foster mom had also thrown his computer away, tossed his money in the fireplace, locked him in his room.<BR/><BR/>Meanwhile, Karen was back at her house, blissfully unaware of what was coming.<BR/><BR/>At five to 3, she was back at the school to walk the kids home. A case manager from Carpe Diem met her there and said, "There's a problem. There's been an allegation."<BR/><BR/>Soon, they were all back at her house -- two workers each from Carpe Diem and the CCAS, a couple of representatives of the local children's aid, the five children.<BR/><BR/>The foster mom sent the kids upstairs, knowing it was futile and that they would hear everything anyway. The oldest girl, with her learned distrust of social workers, was already packing.<BR/><BR/>The questions came hard and fast for Karen. Do you call the kids names? Yes, she said, if you mean did she tell the little boy, "You have to pick up your toys; bend at the waist!" or tell one or another of them, "You can't watch too much of the idiot box, or you'll become one." Do you send them to their rooms? Yes, she said, sometimes, but their doors are open and they each have their own music there and besides, "How do you punish children who have been through what they've been through?" Do you yell at them? "I have five children under the age of 11," the foster mom told them. "You need to be louder than them."<BR/><BR/>A letter from the local children's aid society received more than two weeks after the meeting notes the agency had "verified" certain "protection concerns."<BR/><BR/>The yelling was deemed "moderate risk of emotional harm;" the half-dragging of the little boy "moderate risk of physical harm;" the sending of the youngsters to their rooms -- the little girl, for instance, would be told to stay in her room until she brushed her hair, which could take hours if she got distracted -- was labelled "moderate risk of cruel and inappropriate treatment."<BR/><BR/>Despite that, Karen told The Globe, the local agency concluded the children were not at such risk that they had to be moved. It was the CCAS from Toronto that made that call, and so, that very night, Oct. 4, the youngsters left their foster parents' home forever.<BR/><BR/>When the children were called downstairs and officially "told" what they had already overheard, "all five of them burst into tears." The little boy immediately recanted, said he'd been lying -- indeed, the Carpe Diem reports of this year noted that he "has a tendency to lie about anything and everything" and was bitter about his loss of status -- and that he didn't want to go. The older girl announced she was packed. There was a platoon of cars outside the house, ready to take them away.<BR/><BR/>"I told them, 'Make us proud,' " the foster mom told The Globe, weeping.<BR/><BR/>The three children remain in separate foster homes -- apparently, their therapists believed the sight of one another was causing them to be "retraumatized," so the removal provided an opportunity to test that theory -- and meet once a month for a supervised visit at a neutral site.<BR/><BR/>"They kept saying they had to 'err on the side of caution' because of the 'high-profile nature of the case,' " the foster mom said.<BR/><BR/>She remains furious and bewildered. CCAS workers "were in this house every 30 to 45 days," she said, and knew first-hand how well the children were doing.<BR/><BR/>The Carpe Diem reports refer to increasingly warm bonds the children and foster parents were developing, with remarks from the children themselves that they wanted to "grow up in that house and stay there forever," and praise for the foster parents.<BR/><BR/>Almost gruff and affectionate, the foster mom was blunt that she had expectations for the three youngsters, just as she does for her own two. Where the social workers urged her to be happy if the threesome merely socialized at school, for instance, Karen believed they should also do their homework.<BR/><BR/>It was a bit of a philosophical divide, with the foster mom believing the three were capable of greatness, and the social workers content if they were attending classes.<BR/><BR/>Karen's own two daughters were devastated by the sudden removal.<BR/><BR/>The foster parents had just bought a new van, the better to transport their brood about. The whole configuration of the couple's sprawling new house was geared to there always being five kids there -- bunk beds for two girls in one room; for two others in another; the boy's awash in Spiderman paraphernalia; both leaves always in the big wooden table in the bright kitchen.<BR/><BR/>As plain, good sense was missing in the beginning, so it was again at the end.<BR/><BR/>For years, the Catholic CAS failed to perform what is surely the most elementary task in child welfare -- that is, check out the people getting custody of a youngster -- and ultimately failed to protect Jeffrey and his siblings.<BR/><BR/>Then, when Jeffrey was long dead, the agency was hyper-vigilant, and overreacted to the angry allegations of a furious little boy even though they appear to fly in the face of evidence singing the praises of the foster home.<BR/><BR/>These are flip sides of the same coin -- on the one, extreme institutional sloppiness; on the other, the harshness of zero tolerance.<BR/><BR/>The only independent body that reviewed Jeffrey's death was the pediatric death review committee, originally set up in 1991 and expanded six years later under Ontario deputy coroner Dr. Jim Cairns. He decided, after a series of inquests into the deaths of children being monitored by children's aid societies, that the committee would review the deaths of all youngsters who "died with an open CAS file" within the previous year.<BR/><BR/>It is possible, even probable, that Dr. Cairns could decide after Judge Watt's verdict is delivered to hold an inquest into Jeffrey's death. But just as the review committee can only make recommendations, not impose them, so are inquest jury recommendations merely suggestions.<BR/><BR/>Ontario's Children's Advocate, an agency of the children's and youth services ministry, cannot investigate either, and indeed, in a 2003 report called It's Time to Break the Silence, was pronounced the least powerful and worst-staffed of the eight child advocate's offices across Canada.<BR/><BR/>The Ontario ombudsman, André Marin, appeared this month before the standing committee on social policy -- the group reviewing proposed new child-welfare legislation -- to beg that his office be given power to probe complaints against children's aid societies.<BR/><BR/>In addition, he told The Globe in an interview, he has personally lobbied Premier Dalton McGuinty and the new Child and Youth Minister Mary Anne Chambers to push for independent oversight for the agencies.<BR/><BR/>"It's hard to find a champion," Mr. Marin said, because "oversight means accountability."<BR/><BR/>His counterparts in other provinces, Mr. Marin said, can probe complaints against a child-protection agency. <BR/><BR/>But while his office has investigative tools he calls robust -- the ability to subpoena witnesses, hold hearings, even send people to jail for non-co-operation -- he is precluded from probing complaints involving children's aid societies and long-term-care institutions for the elderly.<BR/><BR/>The bill revising the Child and Family Services Act has gone to second reading at the legislature, but though Mr. Marin said it would take only "a 10-word line" added to the bill to give his office the necessary authority, "there have been no changes" thus far.<BR/><BR/>"It's just a crying shame that children are not entitled to the same oversight" as the Ontarian who is denied a driver's licence, Mr. Marin said. "If you're after a licence and you don't get it, you can complain to me."<BR/><BR/>As Judge Gove wrote a decade ago in his searing indictment of the B.C. child-welfare system, "Child protection has, for as long as anyone can remember, been conducted in secrecy, with at least the perception that social workers are not accountable."<BR/><BR/>There remains no champion for independent investigations of children's aid societies, or for all those children who do not die but are merely injured and who suffer unnoticed.<BR/><BR/>There is none at all for the little boy who was once -- in the relatively glorious months before he was removed from his parents' sometimes violent and always erratic care and placed in the far more dangerous home of his grandparents -- called Jiffy Pop for his popcorn hair.<BR/><BR/>Did Elva Bottineau and Norman Kidman kill Jeffrey Baldwin? Will they be found guilty of murder? At the least, their feet have been put to the fire. They have been called to account. In the matter of dead children in this province, that's as good as it gets. The buck stops with the alleged killers, not with those who arguably placed the victim in their sights.<BR/><BR/>Long-term solutions<BR/><BR/>Change legislation so the independent Ontario ombudsman can probe complaints about children's aid societies.<BR/><BR/>Better fund the pediatric death review committee, and change the definition of "an open CAS file" to include those children who die within two years of receiving services from a CAS and any other case it deems fit.<BR/><BR/>Better fund the office of the Children's Advocate so it can reach vulnerable children, such as those in foster care, to inform them of their rights to complain. <BR/><BR/>Remove the investigative function from CAS social workers and have agencies hire instead former police officers, coroners, public-health nurses -- anyone who "thinks dirty" and doesn't take at face value what prospective caregivers say -- as investigators.<BR/><BR/>- Christie Blatchford<BR/><BR/>Troubling history<BR/><BR/>Jeffrey Baldwin's death was the third high-profile case in less than a decade of a child dying while being monitored by the Toronto Catholic Children's Aid Society (CCAS).<BR/><BR/>Sara Podniewicz, six months<BR/><BR/>Died April 25, 1994<BR/><BR/>Parents convicted of second-degree murder. Expert evidence at trial showed that before she died of pneumonia,Sara suffered multiple fractures to her ribs, arms and a leg as well as internal bleeding in the chest cavity and spinal cord. Jury heard the CCAS case worker relied on information given by the parents and recommended the agency end its involvement with the family.<BR/><BR/>Jordan Heikamp, five weeks<BR/><BR/>Died June 23, 1997<BR/><BR/>Died of chronic starvation while in care of his 19-year-old mother, who had no home, no money and no job. A coroner's inquest, which ruled the death a homicide, heard that the case worker assigned to Jordan saw him only twice, the last time about two weeks before his death.<BR/><BR/>Inquest issued 44 recommendations, including a call for child-protection workers to focus on their young charges and not the parents or families.<BR/><BR/>Jeffrey Baldwin, 5 years<BR/><BR/>Died Nov. 30, 2002<BR/><BR/>Died of septic shock and pneumonia brought on by chronic starvation. Placed by the CCAS in the care of his grandparents, Elva Bottineau and Norman Kidman, both previously convicted of child abuse.<BR/><BR/>They are now charged with first-degree murder.<BR/><BR/>cblatchford@globeandmail.caAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1146496163163834002006-05-01T10:09:00.000-05:002006-05-01T10:09:00.000-05:00I agree with Tara's post above, however I take it ...I agree with Tara's post above, however I take it a step further adn say that WE all failed Jeffrey miserably for not ensuring that the "system" protects children. <BR/><BR/>To Everyone: Please do not fail Jeffrey and any other helpless child again!! Come out to our rally on May 17 at the courthouse 10:30 a.m.<BR/><BR/>It is the silence of good people that lets evil flourish. Get out and make some noise!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1146111140936680992006-04-26T23:12:00.000-05:002006-04-26T23:12:00.000-05:00The conservatives at large have been the absolute ...The conservatives at large have been the absolute worst in this as well. They too despise normal families.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1146110983917133372006-04-26T23:09:00.000-05:002006-04-26T23:09:00.000-05:00I don't know who is blaming Pupatello for this mes...I don't know who is blaming Pupatello for this mess, but I think they have the wrong target. It is government lawyers at fault -she has no control over the "damage control" scheme of things. That being said the NDP have been the best in standing for justice in this disaster.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1146106078114629202006-04-26T21:47:00.000-05:002006-04-26T21:47:00.000-05:00Those involved with the exploitation of children i...Those involved with the exploitation of children in foster care and adoption do not support families - be they parents, aunts, uncles, grandparents or anyone else - as it directly interferes with their goal of finding children for other people. <BR/><BR/>Jeffrey's other grandparents could not even see the little guy. If they had more involvement I believe he would be alive today. The response of the CCAS has been simply unacceptable. Jeffrey was a sweetheart, a helpless little boy -and they do not appear to demonstrate real care for this at all. Fighting the Ombudsman to have oversight of the CCAS certainly does not indicate great care on the part of the CCAS, nor does it indicate any care on the part of the other agencies who do not wish to have any oversight what so ever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1146105755257826372006-04-26T21:42:00.000-05:002006-04-26T21:42:00.000-05:00I think there is a lot of pain and anger on this s...I think there is a lot of pain and anger on this site - primarily as many people who have been in CAS care or involved with them have posted on this site. Perhaps it will give the public some insight into how devastating the system has been to people. As well many of the articles are very informative, and the petition is a fantastic development.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1145932438115591392006-04-24T21:33:00.000-05:002006-04-24T21:33:00.000-05:00Thanks Tara! I will be there too. It will be gre...Thanks Tara! I will be there too. It will be great to see you and others out on May 17 for our rally against injustice as happened to Jeffrey and that is happening to children in Ontario.<BR/><BR/>Everyone: please do not forget Jeffrey, come out and stand firm on May 17 for what you believe in!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1145570022852953422006-04-20T16:53:00.001-05:002006-04-20T16:53:00.001-05:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1145570021511673662006-04-20T16:53:00.000-05:002006-04-20T16:53:00.000-05:00I call it social cleansing with no accountability....I call it social cleansing with no accountability. You know in Jeffrey's case they have done everything to make this look like a "small" incident. This child was so tortured that it is just horrendous. And what was there response - hide or allege to have lost 30 files, make cheap statements to the public, and try and run from the whole thing. That is classic CAS though.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1145510301077939002006-04-20T00:18:00.000-05:002006-04-20T00:18:00.000-05:00there has been a 63% increase in the numbers of ch...there has been a 63% increase in the numbers of children in care in Ontario alone since 1998, the government gave them more power, and risk of neglect became everything, and anything.<BR/><BR/>The cost increased 115% from 542 million in 1998 to 1.16 billon in 2004.<BR/>how many children have been saved???<BR/>how many parents have suffered for very little, or even needlessly because of the changes.<BR/>There own reports state, Case work relation with parents are seen as inessential part of child protection the shift towards investigating ( anything and everything) and REGULATING families, ( did this include over protective moms, advocating parents, messy houses)<BR/>and an increase emphasise on liability ( always this is the bad word)<BR/>and fear of error, ( what about the harm by apprehending children needlessly)<BR/>resulted in the increase of children in care.<BR/><BR/>There needs to be oversight, and they should accept it. Even many of the social workers would not be opposed its the legal depts that fear it.<BR/>There also needs to be a family centred approach , rein in the power, and leave children in their home unless it is absolutely necessary to remove them, Even your own studies done by Child protection have concluded children are safer with in their own families. The stuff on social reform is to sick to post, but many of us understand this is what social work today is really about, others would call it a genocide.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1145509658670971972006-04-20T00:07:00.000-05:002006-04-20T00:07:00.000-05:00Amanda: I just posted on canadiangeek.ca re: Jeffr...Amanda: I just posted on canadiangeek.ca re: Jeffrey Baldwin. I live in Vancouver, BC so cannot attend your rally. I will be there in spirit. This case of abuse has hit me really hard. I'm a single parent of 2 kids about the same age as the "bad kids". My daughter is the same age as Jeffrey when he died at the hands of these sick people. I'm so happy you and others are taking action. I strongly believe we as a community must help each other. Law makers, etc must change their policies to take care of the innocent (whatever age they may be). I'm in tears every day/night since viewing the Fifth Estate program. This beautiful little boy didn't sign up for a life like his. Children are basicly 'trapped'. They don't understand they could run away, etc. I wish I could have taken him and his siblings/cousins away from the horror. I won't sit idle and just write my comments. Jeffrey's death has caused me to take action. In my own little way, I plan to see to it that this doesn't happen again. Will keep you posted.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1145509384325531942006-04-20T00:03:00.000-05:002006-04-20T00:03:00.000-05:00There have been too many cases of children who fal...There have been too many cases of children who fall through the crack of the system and I fear there are systemic fault lines that mean we will hear of more children's deaths in care and bad placements again.<BR/><BR/>The CCAS has said they will co-operate with the inquiry, one would expect them to.<BR/><BR/>Child protection service organizations too often cloak themselves in privacy issues, seemingly more concerned about covering their own butts then improving the system that is suppose to protect children.<BR/><BR/>Nothing can bring Jeffery back, but given the horrifying circumstances around his death the inquest must take a hard look at the decision-making process in child custody. Perhaps Jeffery would still be well, and in school if they left him at home.<BR/>It must ensure that checks and balances that HELP not HINDER ACCOUNTABILITY.<BR/>Other wise stories such as Jeffery's and Matthews will not stop.<BR/><BR/>The shame of that is our collective responsibility.<BR/><BR/>Get out and ask for accountability. Oversight and change. Parents and children are suffering.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1145494610007629612006-04-19T19:56:00.000-05:002006-04-19T19:56:00.000-05:00A blank copy of the petition can be found on the m...A blank copy of the petition can be found on the main page of the dufferin voca siteAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1145491292962643202006-04-19T19:01:00.000-05:002006-04-19T19:01:00.000-05:00Yes it is and Thank you, then send it to Andrea Ho...Yes it is and Thank you, then send it to Andrea Horwath,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1145481119492458052006-04-19T16:11:00.000-05:002006-04-19T16:11:00.000-05:00So if I printed the first post and attached a peti...So if I printed the first post and attached a petition is that all I would need to get it started?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1145479639899178892006-04-19T15:47:00.000-05:002006-04-19T15:47:00.000-05:00We should all be gathering signatures, on petition...We should all be gathering signatures, on petitions, I have, and I have asked others to do so as well, it will may help with achieving oversight. <BR/>Also this Bill will have ( like all bills) a time to make public comments, this is a time we all should make are feelings known. We after all pay to support the agencies.<BR/><BR/>The petition handed in, has over three thousands signatures, most that signed are from the medical field, as well many social workers and their spouses surprisingly came out to sign that petition. This alone speaks volumes<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>The CAS tried very hard to stop people from signing it. Its a story in it self, the levels to which they will go to stop any kind of inquiry's and oversight into there actions.<BR/><BR/>There is a petition now in Hamilton with thousands of signatures , that will also be presented, it as well has been singed by hundreds of people from the medical community here, social workers, teachers, lawyers ( that was the biggest surprise, just how many were willing to sign it, and affix there profession) as were the many doctors and pediatricians, that are also tormented by the agencies here. <BR/>The public is wide awake, and asking for oversight and more then an inquiry into Jeffery's death, they want total change.<BR/><BR/> Literally thousands of people in Ontario should be heard, the story's I have heard by so many are heart breaking, the abuse of power unbelievable, its past time we demand the politicians take action, and truly protect the people they are suppose to represent.<BR/>Many professionals talk about the fear, that CAS will come after them as well. IS this what child protection is suppose to be about??<BR/><BR/>Parents also stating we live in fear, and will do something when are children are 18, parents that all seem to know someone that has been effected by the abuse of power. <BR/><BR/>And parents that have had involvement with the agencies, not many where willing to speak out, they are either gagged still, or traumatized and unwilling to sign a petition for fear of retaliation, this is shocking to me.<BR/> It should be shocking to this government, do they find it gratifying that citizens are living in fear, that so many mothers, fathers, understand that now advocating for their OWN children is NOW done with great trepidation.<BR/><BR/>That many mothers are suffering from post traumatic stress disorder and children as well from dealings with the so called child protection agencies.<BR/><BR/> So with now over five thousands signatures from two community's, do you think the Minister will listen?<BR/>Many people feel we would all be better off with out the Minister of children and youth, its costly and the agency's are harming more children then it has ever helped. <BR/>When will we truly have the will of this government to act on behalf of the citizens of this province?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1145463995755097672006-04-19T11:26:00.000-05:002006-04-19T11:26:00.000-05:00Kudos to Anne Patterson and the London Free Press....Kudos to Anne Patterson and the London Free Press.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1145418055816332922006-04-18T22:40:00.000-05:002006-04-18T22:40:00.000-05:00The top petition is fantastic - good for them in d...The top petition is fantastic - good for them in doing this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com