tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post114406461607219230..comments2024-03-17T03:22:42.344-05:00Comments on Jeffrey Baldwin Memorial Site: Amandahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12477753348213542451noreply@blogger.comBlogger55125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-66924438593281170902010-12-03T19:03:10.029-06:002010-12-03T19:03:10.029-06:00Mywife semi falls asleep on her side she is so was...Mywife semi falls asleep on her side she is so wasted. I just wish Dr.<br />girl sex dog stories invited party<br />gay masturbation stories<br />free detaled porn stories<br />nifty crossdressing stories<br />adult erotic pictures and stories<br />Mywife semi falls asleep on her side she is so wasted. I just wish Dr.big tit lesbian sex storieshttp://doorssedu.dousetsu.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-37816256666366169382010-02-03T16:51:52.045-06:002010-02-03T16:51:52.045-06:00I'm the kind of hombre who passions to seek br...I'm the kind of hombre who passions to seek brand-new stuff. Presently I'm building my own pv panels. I am doing it all alone without the assistance of my staff. I am using the net as the only way to acheive this. I discovered a very brilliant site which explains how to make pv panels and wind generators. The website explains all the steps involved in solar panel construction.<br /><br />I'm not exactly sure about how precise the information given there iz. If some people over here who have xp with these things can have a see and give your feedback in the thread it would be awesome and I would extremely value it, cauze I extremely love solar panel construction.<br /><br />Tnx for reading this. You people are great.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-21970245481390279222008-01-21T15:26:00.000-06:002008-01-21T15:26:00.000-06:00Get your facts straight!!! Most children apprehend...Get your facts straight!!! Most children apprehended by CCAS are born to mothers that are horribly addicted to drugs and alcohol. I have seen the reality first hand. THey inflict permanant damage to there children in utero and then leave them to be cared for by others in society...adoptive parents. GIVE ME A BREAK!! I know MANY MANY MANY biological parents that have created terrible experiences for their children. Take a look at all the children with FAS. Adoption has been around since the beginning of time, it is a beautiful expression of humanitarian love...we are all brothers and sisters in the end. Stop making excuses for peoples mistakes!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144528719945209412006-04-08T15:38:00.000-05:002006-04-08T15:38:00.000-05:00adopted children and their parents also get CAS ha...adopted children and their parents also get CAS harassment, If Ms. Chambers, would like to speak to some "forever safe families" there are a few of us posting on this blog, <BR/>should we not be immune from CAS and the false crazy allegations, after all we are your so called solution to all that ills the children, and abuse issues.<BR/> No sorry its the system,<BR/> because here we are, your "forever families", and no we are not abusing children, but CAS would like to find "another forever family" in many cases.<BR/> Do you understand it never ends.<BR/> No one is safe!!!!!<BR/> No one is safe from the abuse of the power hungry child protectors<BR/><BR/><BR/> And open adoption , do not be fooled, its all up to the adopting parents, a picture a year, is not in the child's or natural moms best interest,<BR/> its in there best interest to stay at home.<BR/> If and only IF the child's natural family ALL agree then the child should be placed with a family that respects and honours the child's biological roots and natural origins, and inclusive relationships are important.<BR/><BR/>Why do so many of us find are self's dealing with CAS, because if you can think, your a risk, if your child has special needs, and many children that are placed for adoption, do come with all kinds of surprises, mystery illness, FAS, FAE, and more, and can you find all the answers?rarely, and even in kinship, which in my opinion should be the first placement sought, and once again ONLY if that child needed to be removed, or was placed ( and that does happen by natural mom.) and done so with out the CAS involvement ( after all its failures) <BR/><BR/>How do you navigate in this no services world with a child, the school does not understand, and it takes years to find the answer, then once you do, well EA are to expensive even if your child would benefit, so can you home school, hell no, and private school, only if you can afford that , along with the orthodontist and all the other cost, but this so called forever safe family is middle class, like so many others, we may in some cases be privileged with a better education, and there for a RISK if we advocate well, and in this time of high RISK of what ever, and parents have become the enemy's at schools, and the doctors office. This is the state we live in, even the so called forever families, if I am honest, as much as I love my child,and I do, I would not have ever adopted or had a child if I knew what I know now. NO one is safe Ms Chambers because the agencies are a mess, and RISK of anything and everything in that last Bill you past is being abused, by everyone. It wont be long before parents of adopted children will all have CAS files open, and many will return them, who needs this. <BR/>There are survival guides on how to avoid the CAS being handed out. There are nurses and doctors , teachers, and yes even social workers, not telling parents how to parent , but how to avoid going broke, and having the CAS come for your child. get out there and talk to the public, talk to the peds, most scared to death because of the young SW storming into the offices and abusing the power, but there names are on the petitions, no one ever seems to present, thousands of signatures of professionals this province can not afford to lose, this government is not paying attention. <BR/>Is this perhaps why SW want to be called doctors. We wont have any at all soon, so perhaps they will have to practice medicine as well, god help us all.<BR/><BR/>But I intend to write the Minister, I am a so called "forever safe family," had it out with the doctor and now, well, here we go again and who is really at risk here, the government, as they will be held accountable at some point.<BR/><BR/>So for now Ms Chambers, me and the other parents your agencies target, the "forever safe families" want immunity, or is it just a game you all play to see how much damage you can cause children. How many forever families will they indeed have, till this so called child protection system is dealt with.<BR/>till then I pray the child I love and raise, will not be found in need of yet another forever safer family.<BR/>She is safe at home right now, but no one is safe from a wrongful or spitful investigation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144370378105661602006-04-06T19:39:00.000-05:002006-04-06T19:39:00.000-05:00To the poster who hates families:At the time of he...To the poster who hates families:<BR/><BR/>At the time of her death, Reena Virk lived in a CAS foster home far removed from her family. The stranger who ran it allowed her to stay out late and provided her with her own seperate entrance.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144351151260692242006-04-06T14:19:00.000-05:002006-04-06T14:19:00.000-05:00The only dispicable words I see are those of the p...The only dispicable words I see are those of the pro-CAS poster.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144350932897179732006-04-06T14:15:00.000-05:002006-04-06T14:15:00.000-05:00You also remembered a frozen young child wandering...You also remembered a frozen young child wandering the streets because of her unfit parents. In that case, the girl had just left her apartment in the middle of the night. She was found directly across the road with no signs of discomfort.<BR/><BR/>Seven years? Let's shave five years off of that. Reena's grandmother had this to say: <BR/><BR/>"Reena was a nice girl," she said. "She was a cheerful, happy young lady, full of life and laughter."<BR/><BR/> "And she always respected us," her grandfather added.<BR/><BR/> In the more than two years since her death the pain has not eased, Virk's grandparents said.<BR/><BR/> "I loved Reena and I miss her," Mukand Pallan told reporters, his voice breaking. "I pray for her soul. I tell Reena, 'You didn't deserve this."<BR/><BR/>Here you are again, ignoring all evidence to the contrary and twisting information to any conclusion that the victims are somehow to blame. You desperately want to blame the family for CAS' negligence in this case. Do you have any idea how sick you are?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144341316310031532006-04-06T11:35:00.000-05:002006-04-06T11:35:00.000-05:00I am not aware whether it was the paternal or mate...I am not aware whether it was the paternal or maternal grandfather on national tv but it was on. We are not talking about what he may have said 7 years later but at the time of her death.<BR/><BR/>His unkind words of his grandaughter were dispicable.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144337900408519212006-04-06T10:38:00.000-05:002006-04-06T10:38:00.000-05:00By the way, Reena Virk's killers were both product...By the way, Reena Virk's killers were both products of foster homes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144333910593645522006-04-06T09:31:00.000-05:002006-04-06T09:31:00.000-05:00Reena Virk's self-esteem issues resulted from her ...Reena Virk's self-esteem issues resulted from her body size and physical appearance. Because she was he considered by unattractive by youths her own age, she was teased or ostracized by others in her age group. In her efforts to "fit in", she began to associate with "street youth" and gang values. Her parents were not responsible.<BR/><BR/>Anyone informed about the Reena Virk case would fully support the family. Obviously, that excludes nutcases like you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144333253437778522006-04-06T09:20:00.000-05:002006-04-06T09:20:00.000-05:00The pro-CAS poster has deliberately manipulated fa...The pro-CAS poster has deliberately manipulated facts regarding several CAS cases. As with CAS employees, you can not trust a word she says.<BR/><BR/>With respect to Reena Virk's grandfather:<BR/><BR/>The elderly man took the stand for the first time to tell the judge how he feels after seven and a half years of grief.<BR/><BR/>Mukand Pallan choked back tears as he described missing his grandaughter every moment and longing to sit with Reena and hear her call him grandpa.<BR/><BR/>"We long to sit with Reena, to hear her voice, hear her call me grandpa. That's my dearest wish, to be together like we were in the same old way."<BR/><BR/>He cried as he told the court Virk will never get to grow up and become a nurse.<BR/><BR/>"She will never be married or know the joys of parenthood," sobbed Pallan who has been in court almost every day of the long trials, his wife who is sick with arthritis at his side.<BR/><BR/>Virk's family has listened to the agonizing details of the attack over and over again. They have watched people lie on the stand and it has driven them into ill health, said Virk's grandfather.<BR/><BR/>Shortly after Pallan's granddaughter was killed, his two sons developed Multiple Sclerosis.<BR/><BR/>His wife's arthritis has become nearly unbearable, preventing her from doing much walking and sitting through the days at court.<BR/><BR/>Pallan said his own heart disease has worsened over the years as he wrestled with constant thoughts of the violence Virk suffered.<BR/><BR/>The trials have taken a lot out of him, he said.<BR/><BR/>"It has been stressful and frustrating, listening to the facts and lies over and over, the horrible details of a crime by two heartless killers.<BR/><BR/>Virk's father hasn't been able to bear witness to the proceedings, too shattered with depression to face it, his wife said.<BR/><BR/>"Reena was very much a daddy's girl," Suman Virk told the court.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144323868748913382006-04-06T06:44:00.000-05:002006-04-06T06:44:00.000-05:00Anyone informed about the Rina Virk case would not...Anyone informed about the Rina Virk case would not be supporting the family.<BR/><BR/>I remember only too well the grandfather condemning Rina on national television after she died a horrible death.<BR/><BR/>I believe Rina was living with her mother at the time of her death. Poor Rina had such poor life skills and poor self-esteem that she gravitated to anyone she felt accepted her including her killers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144303457218912932006-04-06T01:04:00.000-05:002006-04-06T01:04:00.000-05:00We're Allowing Environmental Child Abuse:WE'RE ALL...We're Allowing Environmental Child Abuse:<BR/><BR/>WE'RE ALLOWING ENVIRONMENTAL CHILD ABUSE<BR/><BR/>Date: 000824<BR/>From: www.globeandmail.com<BR/><BR/>A report released this week and changes to an Ontario law put new responsibility on us to protect future generations<BR/><BR/>Trevor Hancock, Globe and Mail, August 24, 2000<BR/><BR/> Is what we are doing to the environment a form of child abuse? Richard Jackson, director of the U.S. National Center for Environmental Health, has said, "People who wouldn't dream of abusing a child think nothing of giving their children and grandchildren an environment that has been abused."<BR/><BR/> I wouldn't suggest -- at least, not yet -- that either the manufacturers of products known or believed to cause harm to children, or the federal and provincial governments whose job it is to regulate them, should be formally charged with child abuse.<BR/><BR/> But a review of recent amendments to Ontario's Child and Family Services Act (OCFSA), and a dire environmental report released Tuesday by the Canadian Institute of Child Health, does raise the question.<BR/><BR/> The act now requires people to report suspected child maltreatment by "the person having charge of the child." That maltreatment includes both actual physical harm and "a risk that the child is likely to suffer physical harm resulting from the person's failure to adequately . . . protect the child."<BR/><BR/> It also extends the definition of child maltreatment to include both actual emotional harm and the "risk that the child is likely to suffer emotional harm . . . demonstrated by serious . . . anxiety, depression or delayed development" where "there are reasonable grounds to believe" that this harm resulted from a "failure to act . . . on the part of . . . the person having charge of the child."<BR/><BR/> This is a broad definition, and indeed may be broad enough to encompass some aspects of the concept of environmental child abuse that I'm advancing. For example, given the evidence of the impact of second-hand smoke on infants and children, one could certainly argue that smoking in a house where children live is a form of child abuse. Indeed, the presence of a smoker in a household has already been used as grounds for refusing adoption and for denying custody in divorce cases. And we may not be too far from the day when the use of household and garden pesticides in the presence of children could be identified as a form of environmental child abuse.<BR/><BR/> Certainly, the sanctioning by boards of education of the use of pesticides in schools is a clear example of the "person having charge of the child" creating a situation where there is a risk that children may suffer physical harm, given what we know about the relationship between pesticides and environmental sensitivity, allergies, and neurological, immunological and other health effects, including cancer. The Institute of Child Health report found a 25-per-cent increase in the rate of childhood cancers in the past 25 years.<BR/><BR/> Surely, any board of education that approves the use of pesticides in schools should be reported to the Children's Aid Society (CAS), at least in Ontario. Indeed, failure to make such a report by a professional (including teachers and physicians) who knows of or suspects such a situation, under the new OCFSA, would open that professional up to a fine of $1,000.<BR/><BR/> However, I'm not concerned so much with these individual acts of environmental child abuse and their potential legal implications, as I am with our collective societal contribution to environmental abuse that will, in turn, have profound consequences for our children and grandchildren.<BR/><BR/> Clearly, the principal target of the OCFSA is the parent or those acting in loco parentis. But when it comes to potentially harmful chemicals to which children may be exposed -- such as chlorpyrifos, a common pesticide that has been in use for decades but now is being removed from the market because of evidence that it may cause neurological damage in children -- who has charge of the child? It cannot be the parent or daycare worker or teacher if they are using a product that both the manufacturer and the regulator have approved. So surely, in a very real sense, it is the manufacturer and the regulator who have charge of the child.<BR/><BR/> Under the terms of the OCFSA, then, it seems reasonable to suggest that the physician, other professional, or indeed any ordinary citizen, must report to the CAS if they have reasonable grounds to suspect that a child is likely to suffer physical harm or emotional harm, including serious delayed development, as a result of the failure of a manufacturer or regulator to adequately protect the child. Surely, the failure to immediately remove a product when there are reasonable grounds to suspect that it might cause physical harm to a child constitutes such a failure. And the repeated failure to remove such products constitutes "a pattern of neglect in . . . protecting the child," which is also a basis for a mandatory report to the CAS.<BR/><BR/> Just how far should we extend this argument?<BR/><BR/> Hard to say. Can anyone seriously doubt that Inuit children born with a high body burden of persistent organic pollutants might suffer physical harm and/or delayed development? Or that some children exposed to the levels of urban smog we experience on a regular basis in and around Canada's cities will suffer from asthma or other health problems? Or that children for several generations to come, for whom we surely bear some responsibility, will likely suffer both physical and emotional harm, including serious anxiety and depression, as a result of the depletion of resources, the warming of the climate, the destruction of habitats, the extinction of species and other damage we are wreaking on the Earth's ecosystems?<BR/><BR/> In short, we are abusing our children's environment and in the process we are, in effect, abusing our children and grandchildren.<BR/><BR/> We are reducing their opportunities for a long and healthy life, undermining the ecological systems on which they will depend for sustenance and bringing them into the world with a body burden of persistent organic pollutants.<BR/><BR/> If these activities do not constitute environmental child abuse, I don't know what does.<BR/><BR/> As a society, we can no longer afford an economic system that provides us with excessive wealth and instant gratification at the expense of future generations' health and wellbeing. Only through a massive transformation of our economic system to one that is fully sustainable in environmental, social and human health terms can we hope to provide our children with the same or better level of health, wellbeing, and quality of life that we enjoy today.<BR/><BR/> As a society we are collectively responsible for what amounts to environmental child abuse.<BR/><BR/> It is time to take this responsibility seriously -- at least as seriously as we take other forms of child abuse -- and begin to make changes in our production and use of chemicals, our use of resources, and our way of life that will ensure a healthy environment for our children and their descendants. Trevor Hancock is a public-health physician and health-promotion consultant. He is chair of the board of the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144302172624393542006-04-06T00:42:00.000-05:002006-04-06T00:42:00.000-05:00you know it is funny that the media does not consu...you know it is funny that the media does not consult more of those who were in the system. this past year has been the best ever thoughAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144300591972324162006-04-06T00:16:00.000-05:002006-04-06T00:16:00.000-05:00That is a great and quite insightful question. My ...That is a great and quite insightful question. My guess is that the numbers are huge. And I would think that the majority are indeed victims of the CAS with very few being actual abusers. And this is precisely what the media needs the guts to say, and to explore. And this issue is the very heart of what should be discussed during a full legal inquiry into the child abduction societies of Ontario, and elsewhere.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144299163901755422006-04-05T23:52:00.000-05:002006-04-05T23:52:00.000-05:00When the Reena Virk incident occurred, the country...When the Reena Virk incident occurred, the country was shocked by it. A common question was where were this girl's parents? Now we know they were blameless. CAS was the negligent party. My question is how many other situations have occurred where people assume that parents are at fault when they are really the victims of CAS?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144299082838135452006-04-05T23:51:00.000-05:002006-04-05T23:51:00.000-05:00The tragic thing about the article regarding Patri...The tragic thing about the article regarding Patrick is that he is still involved with the Catholic Child Abduction Society. I think he is a lost soul, trying to recover, and I wish him only the best. I do hope that he removes himself from the wicked agency though, and that he sticks with real people that actually care.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144298180293760092006-04-05T23:36:00.000-05:002006-04-05T23:36:00.000-05:00When any child is killed it is a tragedy. When tho...When any child is killed it is a tragedy. When those killed by adoptive parents, and foster parents come to light it is not just a tragedy it is more of a travesty. "In the best interests of the child"?? When children are removed by CAS agencies for a so called better life and they are tortured like Jeffrey Baldwin was, or murdered by strangers as in the cases of many stories on this site it is an outrage. It should be evidence enough to have the Ombudsman oversee the CAS agencies of Ontario, and it should make all of society question what the hell is going on with child welfare in general. How can agencies act like God on one hand, deem themselves experts yet when really measured completely steer away??? What type of system alleges to protect children that is caked in secrecy, sealed files, ancient laws, unaccountability, deception and lies? How can any of these agencies think they can protect children now when they refuse to be responsible for the past, and when they refuse to even look at the past? What type of system operates in a cloak and dagger fashion where scrutiny is not allowed, and where total power and control is bestowed like a red carpet of oppression?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144294758631631542006-04-05T22:39:00.000-05:002006-04-05T22:39:00.000-05:00The poster who hates families has shown her true c...The poster who hates families has shown her true colours. At this point, there is not even a veneer of credibility.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144293014801322292006-04-05T22:10:00.000-05:002006-04-05T22:10:00.000-05:00I think the poster has a great interest in promoti...I think the poster has a great interest in promoting the adoption industry - as most who do promote it do so with a hatred for real families. I too think it is stranger that the poster does not appear to care what so ever about abused foster kids, and adopted kids. Nor do they appear to care about the CAS and their ineptitude. God only knows why they would be on a blog in memory of a child killed due to a CCAS decision, and a forum to make the CAS responsible. The only reason that I can think of is to try to make a small attempt and the lies and myths of the system.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144292287703963172006-04-05T21:58:00.000-05:002006-04-05T21:58:00.000-05:00Reena Birk's parents did not turn her over to CAS....Reena Birk's parents did not turn her over to CAS. She was removed from her home on the basis of groundless accusations and placed in a foster home. Her father was criminally charged.<BR/><BR/>The pathetic loser who consistently denies CAS abuse and confirms her hatred of families is at it again. Did you know she claims not to support CAS although every word she posts blames the abused? It's all on another board, including her inability to renounce pedophiles for abusing children in CAS foster homes. Nuts is not the word.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144291436900150302006-04-05T21:43:00.000-05:002006-04-05T21:43:00.000-05:00One of the reasons why so many were abused in fost...One of the reasons why so many were abused in foster care is as the CAS marketed it as being safe, the public believed them and never looked for abuse. A license is not the answer, though clearer monitoring would be a good step in the right direction. And as well many child abusers do not have records either, many people abuse children who have not been charged. This is in part due to the justice system itself. Really there is no fool proof safe guard against abuse in foster care but one of the best ways to prevent it from going on is to start looking for abuse instead of accepting that a homestudy itself is the measure of safety.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144291204471581272006-04-05T21:40:00.000-05:002006-04-05T21:40:00.000-05:00Really a license for foster homes is very much the...Really a license for foster homes is very much the same problem as the "homestudy" issue. Having a few tests to measure what cannot be measured - as in the daily interactions with the caregivers and the children cannot be predicted. Instead of a license all should be done to prevent children from being in the system - and if a child has to be with a guardian they should have long-term and ongoing involvement with the child and the people who are the guardians. A few studies in and of itself creates a false sense of security to the public. It will prompt people to never look at anyone who has a "license" as being a child abuser, with the same damage that the system has done in deeming those who are foster parents and adoptive parents as being safe - simply because they foster and adopt. When we suggest that a certain segment of society is safer we leave that so called safer segment wide open to abuse of power. It reminds me of the child molesting priests - after all priests are supposed to be safe - and not supposed to abuse children. It is this attitude that they are on a pedestal and "better" that creates opportunities for them to abuse their power.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144289768520764952006-04-05T21:16:00.000-05:002006-04-05T21:16:00.000-05:00To the poster that said the stories involving CAS ...To the poster that said the stories involving CAS do not make it to the media, I would agree. They have not even started to cover the real stories from those who were in the system.<BR/><BR/>The few articles of late, are a good start in some ways though.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18672887.post-1144289420060089822006-04-05T21:10:00.000-05:002006-04-05T21:10:00.000-05:00I suspect the heartless poster is the family hater...I suspect the heartless poster is the family hater from the previous blog posts. No family willingly gives their child to the child abduction society, and the notion that they do is indeed part of the lies of the industry that hunts down children. It is also part of the hatred against families that was created in the first place. What happened in the Virk case is horrible. If she was in foster care, she was likely confused, afraid and not doing well - leaving her prone to be more vulnerable to start with. What type of agency simply grabs a child and dumps them into foster homes without an in depth investigation? Yet one of the posters is blaming the parents? Again old trick - let's promote the hatred of families to make infertile strangers seen as being safer. I think this is chapter one in the CAS manual of destruction.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com